Thursday, August 24, 2006

Baby And Special Words

here). WHY 'DOUBT THAT WE ARE THE OFFICIAL VERSION OF' BEEN TOLD?

Why is absurd, contradictory, illogical or just impossible ...

1 - that the FBI has been able to identify all the bombers and nineteen ( so-called "suicide" ) in less than 48 hours, providing much of photography for everyone (some even two), although no Arabic name appeared in the passenger lists (check yourself), and at least half of them were totally unknown to the authorities themselves, at the time of the attacks, by their own admission.

2 - that Osama bin Laden has hatched this infernal machine, whose preparation would last five years,
a) focusing on all total inexperience of its pilots / hijackers,
b) even though he had no real reason to do so (apart from a undetermined "hatred for American democracy"),
c) fact has never claimed the attacks ,
d) who has drawn every advantage was the same administration that he wanted to hit, as far as I know perfectly geopolitical projects and special interests.

3 - that the American authorities, who wanted to show number of times the planes hit the towers, they never presented to the public a single image of the plane that was approaching Pentagon (apart from this and this ridiculous filmatini showing anything but a Boeing 757 ) when
a) should have dozens of cameras to film (and at least four from close range),
b) is known to certain that at least two of these tapes have been seized by 'FBI ( source), and
c) the lack of wreckage of the 757 (see here , here and here ) is precisely the element underpinning all of the allegations the administration.

4 - What also were unable to show any images of video-security of the hijackers boarding their flights, when doubts about their identity are perhaps the second weakness of the entire official version.

5 - What Aziz Alomari and Mohamed Atta, after years of careful preparation, they would squander their entire mission, going to try - for no apparent reason - a connecting flight so tight, that has now enabled investigators to come into possession of valuable items for the survey.

6 - That a hijacker in the process of dying to write his girlfriend - with whom he is 5 years - the wrong address, but remember to put your hand in return, in the event of postal problems (sources : Guardian and BBC ). And generally a bit 'all the hijackers, as they should be careful and precise, have been able to spread along their path only copies of the Koran, credit cards, documents and instructions for those about to die and flight manuals in industrial quantities (source : CNN). German Minister Von Bulow sums up this ridiculous situation .

6a - that these hijackers were also deficient as to get drunk the night before the attacks (as a 757 pilot is also no hands, no?), Although they could not drink alcohol as Muslims, and forget, look at 'the case, a copy of the Koran in strip bar they were gone (not to be believed ... Muslims, too radical, misogynistic and Puritans to the nth degree, which is drunk in a strip bar ...). Here the source.

7 - What four amateur riders, not all licensed, with a bad reputation in flight schools (including for small aircraft and not for large commercial aircraft), and that have never first sitting at the controls of a 757 or 767, have been perfectly able to take possession of it in proportion, to guide you through security without making the slightest mistake, to orient yourself in heaven where they have never flown (some of them had never flown at all), to find targets that were located hundreds of miles away, and hit them with coldness and pinpoint accuracy. One of them in particular, Hanjour would have done this at the end making a spectacular pull-up he is capable of only a fighter jet, and then a maneuver approach (the Pentagon) as illogical as physically impossible (see here) for aircraft of that size.

8 - What of eight riders on 8:00 to 2:00 and co-pilot of American pilots, many of the United - not one has had time to activate the emergency signal indicating a hijacking in progress on the ground. Corresponds to the Button that bank employees were on hand to report to the police a possible robbery. This lack of reporting has allowed authorities to significantly lengthen the time period in which they can claim to "not understanding" that it was hijacked and thus justify the inactivity of aviation. But in fact, established after the first hijacking, would still have had to react immediately to shut down the transponder (among other things unexplained, too) in the other three. Instead it did not happen.

9 - that 19 hijackers, flying hundreds of miles away from each other, and which are not connected to an external director, are able to perform a particular maneuver in perfect coordination with one another (the impact of the one, the other transponder off), but having started from different airports, at different times from those projected, and being unable to communicate directly ( phones and radios do not work at that altitude and that speed).

10 - that they chose a strategy in the first place so absurd, waiting for each one hit its target before the other came into action, with two of them (see here and here) who have even 300 miles away from the target which already had on hand. A strategy that would could work only in the unlikely event of a sudden stall total of U.S. air defense . What then is "miraculously" happened.

11 - That the most sophisticated air defense of the world has gone so conveniently stalled up in those crucial two hours, unable to stop in any way, or even to board, only one of four planes.

12 - What was being just as conveniently, in those hours, and in those heavens, absolutely exercise identical to what was really happening to the four hijacked planes. This fact has contributed a lot to increase the already considerable disorientation of the controllers, civilian and military, caused by a series of contradictory orders which has never known the source. (Source )

13 - What's this embarrassing impasse has not been never provided any explanation, nor appear to have been punished or even identified, one responsible for what happened. (Usually, in situations like this, is the exact opposite: it is urgent for a scapegoat, to be given as soon as fed to the media.)

14 - How many passengers have made phone calls in flight with their phones, when this proved impossible, for at least three reasons.

15 - What of a plane crashing to the ground, but not hit in the air ( UA93), can be found wreckage and human remains over a radius of about 8 miles (13 km).

16 - that the U.S. authorities have argued - and continue to support - that WTC 7 has collapsed on its own, because of a simple fire when they were denied by the same owner of the WTC Plaza, Larry Silverstein, who has however publicly admitted controlled demolition. Not to mention the numerous evidence indicating that a collapse could not have been spontaneous.

17 - What the same authors claim that the Twin Towers have collapsed the pure impact of the planes, and subsequent fires when
a) clearly provided that the project could absorb the impact of more than a big commercial jet, as explained In an interview the same designer Frank de Martini ( download the interview - 742 Kb)
b) to explain the collapse of a vertical stand and need rape beyond all the laws of physics , ignoring in particular the properties of heat radiation steel and
c) findings visual and direct evidence of Firefighters themselves are heavily in favor of controlled demolition, as well as many engineering analysis (see, for example here and here ).

18 - What other laws of physics were suspended, allowing a normal passport card to survive an explosion at about 800 degrees Celsius, and that your passport belonged to one of the hijackers and was accidentally found just from an FBI agent.

19 - That the Pentagon was hit by a Boeing-757 loaded with passengers and fuel, despite
a) some photos, whose authenticity is beyond doubt, show in the disarmingly total absence of its wrecks.
b) still intact on the facade of the Pentagon scored only an entrance hole no more than three to four meters ,
c) 26 of 20 windows on the front windows were still intact , after 'impact, and
d) there is a exit hole of similar size, even within the third ring of the Pentagon, whose origin was never explained by anyone, and that remains to this day absolutely inexplicable.

20 -
that despite the total disappearance of the plane has been can retrieve and identify the remains of almost all passengers, including those of the hijackers. That is, that burning steel and aluminum, but no human flesh.

21 - What have even 15 minutes after the second plane hit the WTC was given the name of Bin Laden as a principal culprit of the attacks, and without presenting any evidence. A really
time record for the resolution of the investigation: never in the history of investigations on issues of international terrorism, there was a resolution of the case in the order of minutes, doubly amazing when combined with the authorities of the official U.S. investigation that up at the time of the attacks would Discovered completely unaware and ignorant of the whole plot of the multi-year conspiracy. (What later proved false )

22 - that the words of Van Romero (one of the leading experts in the field, vice-president of the New Mexico Tech Institute, former director of the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center, "which studies the effects of controlled explosions of buildings), uttered a few hours after the attacks: "My opinion is that after the planes hit the towers, there were some explosive charges placed inside the buildings that caused the collapse of towers , are completely false, and that is lying for some reason. This
hypothesis is also supported by seismographic data (see, for example those of Columbia University here and here ). Were in fact recorded two aftershocks of magnitude 2.1 and 2.3 (far too high for simple spontaneous collapse) at the exact moment of the beginning of the collapses of the twin towers, before the first block and the first ground impact debris. This seems to indicate the use of powerful explosives just before the collapse of the towers.

23 - it's just an incredible coincidence that the U.S. military were preparing war plans against Afghanistan already months before the attacks of September 11. Maybe they were looking for some event which would lead the American public generally disinterested towards a war, as in the past (see historical precedents 11 September) and as thinking of doing the 60 ?

24 - What paper documents incriminating bin Laden and passports were found intact in the ruins of the WTC and the black boxes of aircraft - designed to withstand any kind of accident - were damaged to the point of being unusable ( all of them).

25 - What even after days and even weeks of the attacks on the WTC video operators have been forbidden to take or photograph the ruins from certain angles, as alleged by CBS Correspondent Lou Young, who asked: "What do we see fear?"

26 - What so sophisticated terrorist plan, which involved at least 100 people and a preparation of at least five years, managed to escape all the intelligence services, particularly the CIA and FBI. And instead of trying and dismiss those responsible for this failure and renovate these agencies, are doubling their budget.

27 - What is the South Tower of the WTC collapsed earlier, when it was less damaged North Tower, which had been hit and is in full burned for much longer before it collapses (see here the damage of and those of the North Tower South Tower ).

28 - How many witnesses who claim to have heard more explosions inside the buildings are lying for some strange reason. And because the destruction of the towers is more like a controlled implosion than a spontaneous collapse (see here for the many and obvious differences between spontaneous and controlled demolition collapse)?

29 - that the numbers of seats of the hijackers, communicated via a phone conversation with the flight attendant Madeline Amy Sweeney on board the Air Traffic Control in Boston, do not coincide with the numbers of seats occupied by men who the FBI says were responsible for even quest'hostess lied for some strange reason.

30 - that even the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Saudi Arabia and several newspapers have published the news that they lied when they reported that 13 of the alleged hijackers were not aboard the hijacked planes and in fact still alive. Because these names are still on the FBI list? And why, if as some have argued these cases homonyms, also the same faces of the alleged hijackers? A case with 13 doubles while also homonyms? There is an equal chance of winning the lottery a hundred times in a row.

31 - that, of all flight schools in America, immediately after the attacks the FBI agents have gone in precisely those where the hijackers were trained, without fail, and which schools have guessed were "by chance", as stated at the end of this documentary.

32 - What you mentioned is one of the hijackers carried a baggage for a flight suicide and then he left in his car at the airport along with a letter indicated that as the culprit.

33 - that America has bombed Afghanistan where the hijackers were not Afghans, but Arabs from various Middle Eastern countries.
It 's like if France did an attack on Germany, and Germany in response bombed Italy or England.

34 - that terrorists have managed to get the top secret codes and signals the White House and of the 'Air Force One - an excuse for President Bush tossed all over the country on 11 September, while Cheney's mind took matters in hand and made her comfortable.

35 - that the witnesses who spoke of a second plane that followed the UA-93 (which would have fallen to the ground in Pennsylvania for a courageous rebellion of the passengers) and fireballs exploded in the air are all lying for some mysterious reason, and that a plane crashing into the ground send scrap to 13 km away and only make a hole 7 meters to the ground, leaving no recognizable wreckage (you can find all about the UA-93 here

Jaguar S Type 2000 Cd Changer

OPERATION BLACK GOLD: THE TRUE PURPOSE OF WAR.

OPERATION BLACK GOLD: THE TRUE PURPOSE OF WAR.

Operation Black Gold.
Jeremy Rifkin - taken from www.espressonline.it , 14/11/2002.

To understand how Europe and America have moved away from each other, just listen to what they say on the street all'incombente U.S. invasion of Iraq. In the U.S., most people believe in President George W. Bush when he says that America has a moral duty to protect the world from Saddam Hussein's pathological desire to build and use weapons of mass destruction. On the contrary, in Europe, most people feel that the U.S. is planning the invasion of Iraq in order to secure its oil reserves , Iraq being the second largest producer in the world after Saudi Arabia.

If America were able to get hold of those oil wells, say the Europeans, would be in a position to counter Saudi influence in the region, and could then dictate terms to the future for the rest of the world 'access to oil.

So while most Americans believe that our plan of attack on Iraq is intended to save the world from a madman, most Europeans think that the real madness is President Bush, who as only bad intention to create a foothold in Middle East so that the 'American Empire "will continue to expand.

It should be noted also that the media support the political sensitivities of their respective countries. Europeans believe they have many reasons to be suspicious of the reasons that push the U.S. towards the Middle East. They accuse the Bush administration to pursue in their own self-interest rather than national interests, despite the global responsibilities that were placed in front: for example, the White House's refusal to sign the Kyoto Treaty to reduce greenhouse or the lack of support to the recommendations made at the Johannesburg Summit on Sustainable Development. In both cases, Europeans accuse the U.S. of ignoring their moral obligations to preserve the collective oil in favor of what they regard as an arrogant and blatant attempt by the United States to put their commercial interests before anything else. Including the fate of the rest of the world. Europeans see the then imminent invasion of Iraq as part of a large picture of the White House to cement its position as the first military and commercial.

In America, however, the outlook is rather difficult. Still shaken by the events of September 11, many Americans believe President Bush when the latter asserts that Iraq is a potential danger to their security. The Americans feel vulnerable and worry that America may occur in the future more terrorist attacks like September 11. Many people, therefore, to embrace the idea promoted by the White House of a "preventive action" against terrorism. In addition, many Americans are incredulous to the fact that Europeans do not consider more seriously the threat of global terrorism and wonder why those who are supposedly our allies are so reluctant to side with the United States in their efforts to depose Saddam Hussein. However, one can not but be surprised by the almost complete silence of American politicians and media on the issue of a possible link with oil. It is possible that American political leaders, journalists, columnists, editors, publishers of print media and multimedia, are so naive as to believe that the White House really has no other plans in the Middle East, except those declared by President Bush and his administration? all these people really believe that oil plays no role in strategic thinking of those who belong to the circles of power closer to the White House?

The American columnists, in particular, have argued so much the concern of the White House of a terrorist threat by Saddam Hussein, who gave little importance to the question of oil. And when politicians and the media to discuss oil, it is only in reference to the potential impact that a war in Iraq could have in terms of increase or decrease of oil prices on world markets. There was also wondered which countries and companies could benefit from a regime change in Iraq. But the fact that the Bush administration's determination to invade Iraq can somehow have something to do with the desire to secure oil wells, politicians of both parties and the national media have not uttered a word.

This is even more deafening national silence if you look closely at the key players in this drama. Both the president Bush and Vice President Cheney are oilmen . Both come from the petroleum industry. The careers of both have been shaped by oil interests. Their political fortunes has been touted by the oil lobby. President Bush began its journey as a businessman in the 80s in Texas, and founded a company called Arbusto oil exploration (for more details see " When the bin Laden family did business with the Bush family ") in 1984 , merged with another company in oil exploration, creating the Spectrum 7. And Bush became president. Two years later, she decided to sell his company to Harken Energy Company, for which was already working as a consultant. At the time, Harken had interests in the Middle East. For his part, Vice President Cheney, prior to his inauguration at the White House, was chairman and chief executive officer of Halliburton Company. Halliburton is a leading global provider of products and services related to the oil and energy and does business in more than 100 countries.

No wonder, then, that in the campaign for the presidential elections of 2000, the then Republican candidate George W. Bush has been the number one recipient of money from energy industry, managing to raise more than $ 1.8 million in contributions more than any Another candidate for federal office has received over the past ten years.

If there was any reason to be suspicious of the intentions of the White House on Iraq, certainly the fact that Vice President Cheney has held secret meetings of government behind closed doors with leaders of the energy industry should at least have raised the eyebrow a few belonging to the media, because those meetings took place immediately after receiving his appointment, has been made in order to plan future initiatives in the field of America. And then, despite continuing efforts by members of Congress to disclose those acts, Cheney has refused to release records discussions, in addition to the names of participants and society.

I'm not really say that these private discussions have specifically to do with American security interests in Iraq and the Middle East. Rather, all this shows how the interests of the oil companies are never far from the thoughts of President Bush and Vice President Cheney.
view of the close and old ties of President Bush and Vice President Cheney with the oil industry (such as no other presidential administration in U.S. history) is pretty incredible that no member of Congress or members of the media have bothered to raise the following question: the desire to secure oil resources of the second country in the world oil production, plays a strategic role in any White House policy?

is certainly understandable why American politicians and representatives of the media does not want to question the intentions of America in Iraq: what would make them appear very patriotic. But there are reasons and circumstances rather obvious to suspect a possible ulterior motive behind intention to declare war on Iraq, and would therefore be wise to consider seriously the claims by the European media and much of the rest of the world: that that the real intentions of America in the Middle East are not really what we are told.

Of course, if this second order was also only partly in the heads of those sitting in the White House, the nature of the debate would change dramatically. For the majority of Americans who harbor doubts already about the extent of the Iraqi threat and the need to engage as soon as American troops, endangering the lives of young men in uniform, the prospect of doing everything for ensure even in part the interests of big oil companies would not be well seen, nor well-intended. One thing is sure: the Americans would not support an invasion of Iraq never, nor of any other country in the Persian Gulf, the sole purpose of conquering oil fields. After all, we fought the last Gulf War to prevent Iraq to get their hands on the oil resources of Kuwait.

may be that Europe and the rest of the world are wrong about the intentions of America in Iraq. But the fact that the U.S. does not discuss publicly what the rest of the world suspected to be the real reason why the White House wants to depose Saddam Hussein, makes me think that behind the White House's obsession with Iraq there is much more to what we have been told so far.


Translated by Rosalba Fruscalzo.



Below, a survey by TIME about the true reason why the U.S. invaded Iraq.