Friday, April 6, 2007

Show Me Number 81 In Arabic

Cui prodest? Everything around you



by the messenger on-line April 6, 2007:

" CIVITANOVA. Sacrificial electoral logic to the hill of Villa Eugenia.
Marco Scalabroni (Communist Refoundation) acknowledge Massimo Furniture, city planning commissioner and mayoral candidate of the CDL, to " have endorsed a massive building in the area of \u200b\u200bVilla Eugenia . In the Polo
city council voted a public-private program agreement paving the way for construction of a resort in that area, the project presented by the two companies failed in the examination of the observations of the Prg Bernardo Secchi, that there gardens and pedestrian cycle paths provided. Proposal revived "because important for the development of the city. We are not building buildings, but a urban park and an outdoor arena on five acres, an investment of € 2.5 million 'replies furniture. But Scalabroni " other than development! It distorts the Prg to do, unique case, a tourist village on a hill in a seaside town .
The project covers an area of \u200b\u200b10 thousand square meters for a building of 35 thousand cubic meters, a rise hotel surrounded by several residences. "Where - calls Scalabroni - the public interest? Cecchetti and teach Ceccotti, the gain is only private.
of "great public value " instead speaks securities and insurance, " commitments involving conventional that public works should be carried out within three years after the adoption of the final version, or do not issue the permits to build the village . The agreement does not include, however
constraints to urban use , which would prevent real estate speculation of the private courses already seen in the city, where several hotels have been converted into apartments.

of "urban destruction " speaks to the center-Mobile alleges that " to mortgage the future of the city for electoral reasons. Returns one of the most beautiful, Villa Eugenie, the private speculation "all legitimate" from fig leaf of public interest consists of an outdoor theater. " It also attacks another operation passed by Polo, a framework agreement that will raise "in via Aldo Moro, and in high-risk area, 4000 square meters of commercial justified by the project" Bicincittà. On the eve of the vote the CDL discovers the bike! With this pearl Mayor closes Marinelli consistently as it had begun: in 1995 the beginning of the story Ceccotti, in 2007 the privatization of Villa Eugenia ""

Thursday, March 29, 2007

How To Make Pink Iced Ballet Shoes



purple fire

Thousands expert sociologists and mass-media have spent, in recent times, for understand the phenomenon of the Internet, often without the slightest knowledge of the facts.
Internet 'a blast! Just think of how communication has changed! For better or for worse, of course. A quantity 'of information available immeasurable without (almost) never any filter ... all accessible to (almost) all ... all that talk with everyone (almost) all over the globe. A revolution of global proportions that, in my humble opinion, is unparalleled in human history '(but surely will have' ... and 'that I'm ignorant!).

I do think, however, 'that list a number of issues in a completely random and unrealistic, so' ... 'cause it turns me to do so '...
  1. dependability '
  2. spread awareness
  3. dependence
Trustworthiness' : those who tell us that what we find on-line corresponds to reality (in the true sense of reliable or truthful)? It 's the main problem collaborative web, or as it is fashionable now to call it Web 2.0 , think for example Wikipedia: Anyone can' make a contribution to define, for example, what Web 2.0 or what the prosecution of former premier . Fans of the wiki they say they are the users themselves to work an iron control over the content so that the work of all is not discredited. But I / I ask you ... in this way are not suppressed minorities? And again, so is the 'knowledge' and not 'in hand only to those who have the mastery of the internet?
I like this quote about Nanni Moretti:

I was thinking of something very sad, that I, even in a more decent than this, I will always with a minority of people. But not in the sense of those movies where a man and a woman who hate each other, we devour on a desert island because the director does not believe in people. I believe in people, but I do not think in most people. I guess I will find myself always feel comfortable and in agreement with a minority ...
[from " Dear Diary"]

Dissemination: what 'the degree of accessibility' of online content? Accessibility 'in the sense of what percentage of world population has access to the network? This percentage is' significant relative to the total? And, above all, those are the subjects' active ', ie actively supporting'? Let me give an example that we want to talk about the surmolotto , and I am the most experienced global surmolotto 'cause the study years. But I do not have access to the internet 'cause I live in a mountain town that does not even take the phone. All my knowledge on surmolotto I keep it for myself and (tying the concept expressed earlier) many of the Internet will give credit to those who know nothing or very surmolotto younger than me ...

Consciousness: 'cause the post is called "all around you" like an old commercial? 'Cause your way' ... and I see the network 'around us and lives its own life ... do not need us unless we do not want to contribute. But consciousness of what '? Its potential? Yes, but not all. Its role? Yes, but not all. Its NOT be reality 'of his being virtual? It 's not the virtual network to be ... but it is' hyperspace is based on that information and bases and has its roots and draws its sap. But not only ... think that Second Life is virtual? Think about that when in a chat room not been talking / interacting with a person? Maybe it will be 'a person who hides behind a person and IODigitale but always' ... I mean by consciousness. Internet and 'ONLY A MEANS! To communicate / inform / entertain / love / know / etc ...
as such must be considered and then or else ...

Dependence , otherwise you end up dependent on it and not vice versa as in reality 'E'. Internet and 'its users and not the other way ... at least not yet. Maybe in a few romazo of science fiction or in a few films like "The Lawnmower " ... but not yet. Internet such as heroin or gambling? Maybe, but also more 'dangerous and alienating to some extent.

conclusion ... there is' a conclusion, only a lot of ideas / thoughts / considerations knocked out 'in a hurry without any particular reason ... a little' as the network?