Commision Agreement Template

Dialogues in the sea of \u200b\u200blove and death


a different place from the other, a story, perhaps a reflection that for sure know who to focus on: to life, who made me and makes me feel love, because in this way I'm not afraid of death :

The man was sitting in front of the mirror of water, flat glass, which reflected the purple and orange of the dawn, but that other presence, that man But clearly warned, the result of years of expert company.

- "Even today, come and see me earlier than usual, early in the morning, not at dusk as it often uses. I would think that this time you would not Thee do not let the illusion of thinking, not just to meet you one day, I do not exist. "the man said.
-" How do you know myself here at your back when your watchful eyes observed the water , deprived of my back? "
-" You forget that people live and why, before seeing you, you feel, every moment of its existence. They are not my own two eyes, but the breath of life that animates me to advise me of your presence. Even after so many years have you learned? "Replied the man.
-" But you should see me now, why I came to get you. Times as well, "was the call that gave him death.
- No upset, fearing nothing, man first inspired and then blow out the air strike, issuing a long puff, "I do not need to turn around to see you, you already know so much and too long."
- "And when was the first time, you who have known?" demanded the death, with a mocking tone, as if amused, but cheating on the true nature of the request, the innate curiosity about life.
- "For years and years and you feel that you talk to me and it still appeared to me hungry for life," said the man, smiling, without turning around "you can not help but try to understand what is not yours: life , man, the feeling that the soul and the idea and thought that you. If it were true as you say, that after so long, now, you come get me, I have to satisfy your curiosity now this, having not, then more time. I know you since I was a child in the face of the game hunted for lizards, were evils of an Innocent Child, which is believed to give the master of life and death, how you deceived, to be the lord of life, but you know that nothing you can on it, you know that the government and she is, instead your mistress, you do not exist without her "
-" What do you think, I mocked? "hissed death" is not in this so shake off the fear, the fear of having to drop everything, to have come away with me ".
-" I have no fear, because as a child you knew, too, pale in the face my grandmother's framed by flowers and light candles. We knew and understood that you had been there only a moment and then was gone, already at the moment that you left the immobile body of that old woman who, years earlier, she smiled at me and took me around the neck, back when I had four legs. There was already more after that moment, while there was a little cold body of my grandmother, but his memory will always have existed. "
-" What I want to tell the old and trivial story of eternal life, immortality of the soul? not deceive you, old man, after that you'll be all gone away, "chuckled death.
-" Do not m'illudo "the old man" but I know that you are like birth, a moment when you open that curtain that you come to close, but there is always someone who will remember the show seen on stage. When I come with you, I know it's over for me, in me there is life, but I am in life, part of me will always exist in life: I will stay in a thought, in the moment of a memory, in which each I have known and lost in the sea of \u200b\u200blife, to warn me of such a time, a distant echo.
- "What do you think you have left in life, in others, hope that you remember? What goals do you think you have achieved, you can tell you satisfied with your trip? "He said sarcastically death" live only past, memories and this is a sign that the time has come where you're coming with me, "said severe death.
- This is your anger, not passing, I remember, even after many years of occupation, you asked several men to come with you, follow you, but you saw them all the same and you never know the difference. In your eyes the sea wave that leaves the beach is the same, after a moment, regaining . And 'the water to be the same, not the wave, the beach and know why each one retains the humor and nostalgia. You compel everyone to follow but you can not get hold of his mood, the essence of all existence. "
- death was quiet, thoughtful "And what is your essence? "
-" I traveled, I have chosen a path in front of two or more different paths, and over time I learned that you can not tell you for choosing the right one or wrong one, because on this trip, you are selecting Once in front of each junction and each one is different from the previous year. I know, though, that I have accumulated more remorse and regret that this is my worry, "the man said with a whisper," I should get this some day with some regret and remorse in less than it would have been the sign of I have some choice and instead traded for the wait. So I learned to be wary of those who say they love a quiet life, why are those who are afraid to be daring call waiting and living that life chooses for them. There is no success without some scars for the defeats. "
- The death of the observed, seemed to have understood, or perhaps reflected, a flash across his shadow, it seemed that death was on and it appears as though the ' water, for a moment, reflect "what do you mean old? explain. "
-" at the time said I was a boy, but now at this age, having lived so many days, I know I was when I was a child. Likewise, her beautiful, fresh, clear dawn of a day full of hope. I fell in love. "I was not rich, I was not nice, but while still a child, she had the instinct of which only women and have saw something in me that even I knew. Perhaps he felt that I asked the tenacious resistance to the force of attraction I felt for her, the other looked like extreme shyness, but she came as a silent courtship of words measured, framed by smiles. Such different ways by arrogance of the other guys. But it was above all the ability to talk that led to increasingly seek with the desire of the whole day to tell, to speak of where we lived a few years earlier than those in which we had known, stories of trees, ran on meadows, carefree evenings under clear skies with stars and suns and nights spent in the calm and peaceful sleep quilted blankets dreams. Among all, I remember one day, apparently the same ones that now everyone else envied me, as usual, spent with her alone in the company of our country. We were lying with his face to the cobalt sky, immersed in the ears of ripe corn, side by side, hand in hand. I told her again and told me what he saw in me, and probably spent hours or possibly years, but everything seemed to last a moment, listening to her voice, smell his breath mingled with the grain. I had never kissed her and I had a great desire, but bigger, that day, was the fear, the fear of ruining everything, and destroy those eternal moments to be alone with the scar of defeat. So that day ended and I kissed her, neither then, nor ever again. A month after he left, with his family in another city. I felt and I hoped that I thought and I still feel, that I felt that I had that desire to see her again and lie down next to her on that field of wheat, lying along the side of the hill and hoped that this would be back. I learned a few years later, that was engaged and some time after that came the news that she had married. That day passed in the wheat field is my regret, I would change with the remorse of having done something that could be defeated, but that it would live. For years I kept alive in the heart of the smell of his breath mixed with that of wheat. For this reason, year after year, that same day, I sent a loaf of bread that I made with my hands and that wheat flour, in the hope that aroma that brought her the memory of that day and she came back. It was when I knew I had died I stopped to be a baker and then spend my days in front of this lake. That day, you had brought with you, but you do not remember, why not take the essence of life, master of nothing. Not until today have never heard of this story, too distressed to take the life to be able to see and discover. "
- said the death, lost in thought" and then, until he was in life you lived in hope that I've stolen and who died, when I asked the woman to follow, "said Death," and then now that you have to follow you too, of course, even more than you hope that the past returns with the garment of another woman.
- "that hope never dies, no one can know whether it will be tomorrow and the day when I will be lying with her, hand in hand, surrounded by wheat fields."
- old! I am very busy, others are waiting for me. For today I decided to leave you here again in front of your lake, in your memory, "said Death," but I shall return. " A moment later he turned, walked, and then come "There is still that field of wheat?" he asked.
- "Yes," replied the man "if you will, one day you 'll take. "
received no reply, if death had left. It was now evening, a full day had passed. The man got up to walk towards the country. He arrived in the square, by which time for his tired eyes and old was not enough the little light left. But the same saw his old childhood friend, sitting on the stairs of the church.
nodded and approached him.
- "Even today you have spent the entire day facing the lake, "asked the friend
-" yes, to study fish, insects and the apparent immobility of the water, "said the man
-" and I bet that even today, you met your old girlfriend, to talk to for a long time. "
- "I know well," said the man, "but today was a different day. My partner and I wanted that I followed had the feeling that he had now decided to push me in that water and left to sink, but then I convinced to let me sit in front of the lake. I planted in her the seed of desire, curiosity, his innate interest in life, who takes away, but that does not know "
-" did you tell that old story of the girl and the field of wheat. The same gentleman who told you that you bought the bakery then. Could you make it believe you have cheated death with even the false story! " said the friend, laughing.
- "already" replied the man, but as long as he sold bakery, a tear slid down her face, as at the time, which was drowned in the heart, resurfaced a memory, a regret.

Wear Red Lipstick Everyday

About how the genetic code supports Darwinism

Just today I found myself saying to students that the genetic code is simply one of the biggest evidence uncovered over the past fifty years (he was discovered in the 1960s) which confirms, in clear and elegant way, Darwinian evolution - especially when operated in its most fundamental level possible, ie the molecular level.

What is the genetic code?

We often use the term genetic code as an expression synonymous with "complete set of DNA from a cell", ie as a synonym for what we consider the genome of an organism. Technically speaking, however, when geneticists say genetic code they are not talking of DNA content of organisms. Indeed

the genetic code consists of a molecular code for passing the information contained in DNA to the information contained in proteins . To simplify the story, back a little on the theory of inheritance. We know that our cells contains 46 DNA molecules, which consist of large tape calls chromosomes. Each of our cells contains 46 chromosomes, 23 Heard from our father and our mother's legacy 23. It turns out that the DNA is considered today as a book kept on the shelf (or like a cake recipe), it contains a lot of information but it is considered chemically inert , ie it does not act effectively in the intracellular environment. The four chemical bases that make up: A, C, G and T teem a structure very similar and do not allow the realization of complex chemical interactions that form the cellular metabolism. (This argument has even been used many times - before Watson and Crick - to argue that DNA could not be the molecule of heredity.)

Anyway, today it is known that DNA, although chemically inert, contains necessary and sufficient information to direct the synthesis of other chemically active molecules, especially proteins. So that has a cell metabolism and is capable of transforming chemicals is necessary that the information contained in their DNA - and formed by chromosomal tapes containing millions of base pairs A, C, G and T arranged in a row - is converted into protein molecules. DNA, therefore, has two main functions, namely: (i) have the code of heredity and (ii) contain the information for making proteins. function (i) has to do with evolution and the fact that children resemble their parents, it is studied mainly by discipline of genetic . Since the function (ii) is related to how DNA controls the metabolism of a cell, and is academically studied mainly in the disciplines of molecular biology and biochemistry. Environmental cues to stimulate DNA transcription perform certain pieces of its molecule. Transcription is the process where the DNA form what is called messenger RNA (for details, click here ). This mRNA contains the information of the gene, which now leaves the nucleus (safe dwelling DNA) and to the cytoplasm will be translated into proteins. Information flow DNA to proteins is known as the central dogma of molecular biology , and was proposed by Watson and Crick some time after the discovery of the structure of DNA double helix (1953).

The central dogma of molecular biology indicates how the DNA information, which is chemically inert, information is transformed into protein. The protein molecules are mainly responsible for the control of cellular metabolism and, therefore, of life at its molecular level. [1]

Proteins are polymeric molecules made up of 20 different types of monomers, called amino acids. A polymer can be considered as a string of pearls, where each pearl is the monomer of the polymer paste. DNA is a polymer whose monomers (beads) are the nucleotides A, C, G and T. A small "necklace of DNA" could be formed by the following set of nucleotides: ACTCGGACATTTTACAGACACACGGAC. Since the protein is a polymer whose monomers are 20 amino acids, namely: (i) Alanine, (ii) cysteine, (iii) Aspartic acid, (iv) Glutamic Acid (v) Phenylalanine, (vi) Glycine, (vii ) Histina, (viii) isoleucine, (ix) Lysine, (x) Leucine, (xi) methionine (Xii) Asparagine (xii) Proline, (xiv) glutamine, (xv) Arginine, (xvi) serine, (xvii) Threonine, (xviii) Valine, (xix) Tyrosine, (xx) Tryptophan. Unlike nucleotides, which are chemically inert, each amino acid has different chemical properties differ, and some are positively charged, while others are negatively charged, while others are hydrophobic. The chemical diversity of amino acids is what allows the proteins have different roles in cellular metabolism, being responsible for some molecules bind in aqueous media, other functioning as pores for passage through the plasma membrane, other traveling the blood to other tissues and function as hormones. Finally, the combination of these 20 "pearl" necklaces aminoacidic to form protein allows proteins to have an incredible diversity and chemistry that can link different molecules that interact with our bodies. And to top it off the chemical diversity, these collars proteins are also able to curl up in space and form three-dimensional structures are highly complex, which greatly influence the shape of the operation of our cell metabolism.

Chemical formulas of the 20 amino acids that make proteins. Divided into chemical classes, amino acids can be charged positively or negatively, may still be polar or nonpolar without charge. This diversity makes the protein chemistry (polymers containing between 30 to 1000 amino acids, typically) highly reactive molecules. Besides the chemical diversity, the proteins also have structural diversity, given by three-dimensional conformation of amino acids in space. Figure obtained this site.

Although other molecules such as nucleic acids, lipids (fats) and sugars (carbohydrates) are highly important for cell metabolism, biologists molecular believe the key molecules that control and command the operation of a cell are the same proteins. E is the DNA that has the code for the formation of these proteins. Therefore, DNA and acts indirectly controls cell metabolism.

Finally the genetic code was perhaps the major discovery made after Watson & Crick had discovered the double helix structure of DNA, the understanding of this code allows us to understand how a code of four letters (nucleotides) of DNA is able to produce a code of 20 letters (amino acids) of proteins. The comparison of DNA and protein with letters and words made here is not merely a way of simplifying or analogy; teem DNA and proteins, as well as languages, syntax and semantics that can be learned from his observation and analysis. Interestingly, the story of the discovery of the genetic code is a very interesting topic that promise to be back here to tell. What matters here is that, when we speak of genetic code, we're on the mechanisms of transformation of a molecule of nucleic acid in a protein molecule . The origin of the highly complex mechanism of translation is still a mystery (that's right, the process is called translation and works similarly to the translation between languages), but experimentally the researchers were able to discover that for every three adjacent letters found in the coding region of a gene, the cell is able to produce a specific amino acid. See the table design of the genetic code below:

The table of the genetic code. Although the genetic code word is often confused with the gene content or genome of an organism or species for geneticists is the genetic code in this table, ie the code by which a triplet of nucleotides in DNA is converted into an amino acid that will be part of a protein.

The table above has been demonstrated experimentally in a variety of organisms, and it represents the translation between the encoded language of DNA chemistry and chemical language of proteins. The manufacture of proteins often begins with the crack (codon) ATG (or AUG), which encodes the amino acid methionine (Met). And so, the letters of the DNA (processed in the intermediate messenger RNA) below enabling us to translate the information in a language-of-information in DNA to a language-of-proteins. A sequence such as ATG-CCT-CCA-GGT-CAG-GGA-GTC-TGA in the DNA in the cell will be transformed - by the mechanism known as translation - in a protein with the amino acids Methionine-Proline-Proline-Glutamine-Glycine-Glycine -valine (which can be also described as Met-Pro-Pro-Gly-Gln-Gly-Val, or, more briefly, as MPPGQPV). The last codon TGA (or UGA) is the signal for the end of protein synthesis where DNA signals to the cell that it should not continue translating it and that code for proteins that ends there.

How and why the genetic code is consistent with Darwinism?

Given the enormous diversity organisms on Earth, would can think of each different organism could use a different genetic code to produce its protein. It is theoretically possible to think of alternative genetic codes, where the assignment was different crack-amino acid shown in this figure. (Francis Crick himself has even proposed a different genetic code that would make such an allocation between DNA nucleotides and amino acids in proteins. And although the code non-punctuated Crick was beautiful and elegant, it was not observed in any organism. And the development science always requires experimental confirmation to prove that if you wish.) Meanwhile, molecular biologists have investigated hundreds of thousands of living organisms, from the most ancient bacteria, through animals in the sea, in fresh water under the earth, the mountains, we investigated the fish, amphibians , reptiles, plants, algae, fungi, primates, marsupials, cyanobacteria, the archaebacteria and, finally, all known organisms. In none of these organisms the genetic code was very different and we know that this is represented in the table above. Only a few bodies teem either codon (triplet of nucleotides), which makes a different assignment, and these consist of just the exception that proves the rule. [2]

The fact that all living organisms have the same genetic code - or at least a very similar genetic code - is considered by scientists is evidence of two facts: (i) all living organisms few are descended from organisms that lived in the past and (ii) the emergence of the genetic code and translation engine brought a huge evolutionary advantage for organisms that were able to use it . The fact that (i) is the main sub-theories of Darwin, which is called common ancestry. Charles Darwin was the first person to say that all organisms on Earth have a common ancestor that lived in the past and was being distinguished in living species. Darwin did not live long enough to see the molecular corroboration of his ideas, but it certainly would have found it brilliant to see how all life on our planet that we know has the same basic code for making proteins. If organisms are not descended from a common ancestor, they could have completely different codes and their proteins could make a totally different and creative. They could even have some kind of metabolism that was not based primarily on the interaction of proteins and metabolites from each other. But such a body ever seen and we believe that there is at least on Earth. So the fact that all living organisms have the same genetic code is one of the strongest evidence of common ancestry among them and was a key corroboration of Darwinism made in the second half of the twentieth century, little more than a century after the publication original work "The Origin of Species" in 1859.

we focus now on the point (ii) presented above, which says that the first organism in which the genetic code appeared (and therefore the translation engine) has had an enormous adaptive advantage relative to other organisms that lived in his time . No I want here to extend the discussion of how the bodies were in a world where the genetic code did not exist. If I did, would be returning to the subject of the origin of life, highly controversial topic that can generate an entire work just heated discussions about very interesting details. I wish here only to show that by the time the genetic code emerged, there should be several types of proto-cells that were able to produce proteins from DNA in a highly inefficient. While the emergence of the complex mechanism of translation (and the genetic code) has been a rather large "evolutionary leap" still unexplained, since this mechanism has emerged (from quite similar to that which exists today), the bodies were able to use this code evolutionary won the war against other organisms that can coexist in the same season. And the proof is the same as that used in (i) there is no other body that is able to do differently this protein that uses the translation engine and where broken DNA are translated into amino acids according to the genetic code the figure. If there was another efficient way of producing proteins by living organisms would be able to see any animal or plant or fungus that would use any alternative mechanism, which does not happen. So the first guy who was able to make proteins according to a proto-code like this that we have today, he subdued all its competitors in the evolutionary race and what we see today in all the diversity of life on our planet, are the descendants of ancient organism that was able to use sequences of code- three chemical letters of nucleic acids to produce a letter of protein chemistry.

The human genome is the set of all genes that humans possess, and also non-genic regions. Although only 1% of our genome is responsible for doing what we call the genes encoding-de-proteins, these regions are now considered as the most important of our genome. Recent estimates speak that human beings have something around 30 000 protein-coding genes and are mainly those interactions between these proteins within our cells that make our body work coordinated in a highly complex and wonderful. The same goes for most other living organisms, also possessing tens of thousands of genes in their genomes, are able to turn those genes into proteins through translation engine that performs the reading of the genetic code and allows the existence of cellular metabolism . This amazing and wonderful code that when present, almost unchanged in all living organisms, consists one of the greatest tests that Darwinism really is not just theory or supposition: it is fact.

==


[1] Another important and necessary predisposition "theory of the central dogma" is that once the DNA information is written in the form of proteins, it no longer returns - ever - to be DNA. This fact was also interpreted as the definitive refutation of the Lamarckian theory of inheritance of acquired characteristics. If that ever happens to the proteins back to DNA, then there is nothing like that happens in the life of an organism to cause impressions in their genetic material, material that is passed to this your child. It is worth noting that today there is evidence that some more subtle features can be re-printed in the DNA in the form of changes in the bases C, which may be methylated, or structure of the proteins that surround the DNA (chromatin) - see posting on epigenetic .
[2] Notes to the author, when you want to actually publish this text in the book: to give examples of alternative genetic codes, such as the mitochondrion, explaining the differences. Also explain how the roles have evolved codon-amino acid according to the theory of Savio / Romeo .

Pilote Windows 7 Frdell Optiplex 620

daughters and stepdaughters, chickens and chicks ...

not interested in the question of the bung, bung. Ruby Do not want to talk about the issue and treat it like what has been done in recent months in relation to various issues such as that of Austrian politicians in Italian villas that guests show off their passions nudist, or escort "escorted" in different places for reasons little institutional. I do not want to do to not fall into the trap of false moralism, because the issue is moral that is of another type. Of course it remains to ask why so many cases they see young and beautiful girls are the light of day and always see the most active and engaged or not the figure of Silvio Berlusconi.
But I will not address the issue as many have done. To do so would only expose himself to the defensive countermeasures such as "are questions concerning the privacy of the rest .... aera Kennedy also talked about but he is remembered as a great politician ....." I do not want to do because then maybe look like the man who Rosica why can not it do the same and subirei the objection of those supporters who say that Prime Minister Berlusconi as well as great entrepreneur, we face a great figaccione, Chiappino, etc.. etc..
But the substance remains, I will not do why do not wish to be accused of false moralism, as the issue is moral and what I mean.
Ruby does not present the question, because those who do not know it yet it means that little information. Offered for the few who still ignore a link all (corriere.it). In short, according to press reports, Silvio Berlusconi's chief of staff calls the police headquarters in Milan and called back an hour later the Prime Minister caposcorta recalling the police officer. He wanted to be informed on the evolution of the story, asking for further clarification. Corriere.it writes that both demonstrated in the report submitted by the service Quaestor Vincenzo Indolfi at the Interior Ministry. On the evening of May 27, 2010, while Ruby was subjected to photo-, there were then two calls by the head of government. At 2 of the night the young Moroccan left the police station together with the Regional Councillor Nicole Minetti, just as he had requested the Prime Minister and how he had authorized the magistrate on duty Anna Maria Fiorillo. For those who do not know Ruby instead offer another link, the source certainly not party to the Premier ( TGcom ) that does not tell, but let it be the same to tell Ruby alone. You have seen if you read the link or know if you were informed, it is a (at this point seems different) girls who attended the homes of the Premier. Without wishing to tell and write about these meetings, parties, entertainment of various kinds (let to tell here is Ruby and read the link because if there were crying would also be fun) I want to dwell on various aspects.
First : Berlusconi said in recent days among other things, that the declarations of Ruby would do understand the inconsistency of the gossip. I do not think it is true to a report in the press (even TGcom ) about such statements. Ruby says, in essence, that night of S. Valentino in Berlusconi's villa in Arcore, the premier front of invited "teasing left-wing politicians, like Bersani. So far nothing but the usual story that Berlusconi satire just like when the he does not when the others are doing on it (example of democratic spirit)
Always remember Ruby in his interview with "Today." "She showed us a marble statue with his face and body of Superman." Here too little news (the usual delusions of grandeur typical of many people especially when they arrive at a certain age). Then
Ruby adds, "... I said I was all dressed up and I have long legs. We were ten girls. Then he dedicated a song, because I was new. I sang If you were not you of Apicella. Here, too, nothing new, besides the usual script approach to women, even the usual classical repertoire and worn in fact singing.
But then Ruby appears in all his shyness and says " I said I was all dressed up and I have long legs. I would just say thank you. I did not want to give too much confidence, not knowing what kind it was." Poor thing, being Italian is not accustomed to certain traditions and customs.
Forget the usual story of a new and a little joke (that of Bunga Bunga ) made by Berlusconi, also for lack of novelty. We thus arrive at a first point, that has the comic. Tells Ruby that he wanted to leave because "... I was uncomfortable because everyone was familiar with him and not me." She was not poor, the usual immigrant discrimination.
always says that Ruby did not go away just because "but first he took me upstairs to his office" (which she did not have the confidence of the other we went upstairs, poor fawn inexperienced confidence not because he does not know what kind she would like Berlusconi says, but follows him on why the door to the office and she thinks that maybe the reason is to discuss the issue of immigrants and poverty in the Maghreb.
later confessed that there Berlusconi shows why his powers as a clairvoyant (no know how he did it because she new and not in confidence) "knew of my problems and wanted to help" so that would give her an envelope with € 7 000, saying they do not want anything in return, adding: "I do not I'm a bad man, do not stand on your own. "That's the politician, a statesman, is offered in time of need. Maybe it would be nice if we say at least 7 000 € multiplied by ten, Berlusconi had given to them some research institute (research need it in this country) and the Italians would have better understood knowing that the money gave them to him to get something in return or some progress in science. What I do not understand is, however, when you give to a 7 000 € person "without asking anything in return" and maybe this time just multiplied by ten (the girls as Ruby says there were ten and more confidence in her. Truly, Ruby reveals that "Silvio has given us a Damiani necklace with a heart because Valentine's Day was "sentimentalist!).
Let then the statements that come to ridicule like this: " I could eat better " " The taxi approached a side entrance. Priscilla (his Brazilian friend, Ed) called at the villa and the police have left us through. When I saw that villone I asked my friend where we were. And she said 'the President'. Street Mission had a stroke. Until a few months before I slept on a bench in Catania.''
clearly the first question, just as Berlusconi said (the words of Ruby will clarify everything and I hope that you too will have a better idea) we pass to the second point today Berlusconi motorcycle at the show, I do not know if after speaking also of the problems of two-wheelers,''said better to be passionate about beautiful girls gay.'' what is the problem here: even Giovambattista Adornato (the indifferent pissed of the blog) would be able to say something even more in the worst sports bar now feels more. We complain if in Belgrade during the gay pride, nationalist groups are trying to crack some heads. Censor and condemn certain behavior if, as happened in Rome, someone tries to take out some homosexual. While in Europe, member states seek to implement policies and promote the anti homophobia, our Premier makes this great statement, Such "pork 'I've got the world under your feet, if I discover that my son is gay .... I do" remember Drive and Faletti.
last question perhaps the most serious moral and not moral. In short, you'll see that Ruby, born Moroccan Karim El Marhug is, well, at the material time, is a minor leak "under observation" by the police on charges of theft, which then leads a life in Italy a little special ( as she says "I slept on benches in Catania"). Today Maroni (Northern League interior minister) is pleased , because Milan prosecutor's office says that there is nothing in the facts of the call to the police station. But what Welcomes? The League has made it a matter of policy agenda: the immigrants who live off their wits in Italy, return to their country. This time what they say to a Moroccan aid that does not seem "very regularized" in Italy, or at least much less than many poor people or carers looking for a paid job with a loaf of bread so as not to go back to hell. Who meets this need: the envelope, without wanting anything in return, I will not say with 7 000 €, but only those with 700 € from the daughters. The league does he say this time? how much is federalism? here is the moral question and the moralist: the politician who represents us should at least be consistent to be credible? I would not find out, as they say that in Italy there are sons and daughters, and even chickens (we hope not to be us) and pullets.