Anti Freeze In Pokemon Soul Silver

Dances with sharks

Start with a premise: I get to write a post after a long time, but do not blame the mirror, which has continued to show images. The cause is my will, a choice.
The initial symptoms consisted in alerting a kind of laziness, like a sudden emptiness. Anyone who knows me knows that could not be empty and in fact, was only willing to " reflection" (in fact I compare myself with the mirror).
For the record, I felt the need, say, to "restructure" something in the soul, the need to assess and evaluate a range of topics, themes, issues, choosing those that would stimulate not only the writer, but above all, the reader. Perhaps the fear of becoming commonplace, both in the choice of the topics shown in the mirror, which, in the treatment and tell.
I have to say, then, I was pleased to hear two recurring questions that I have placed some readers of the blog: "But why not publish any more?" and "but when you republish?".
So I thought it was long enough this kind of "digestion" and finished this post, which, actually, I started writing the first days of the date on which appear in the blog.
Closed, completed the premise, here is the post. The title may
suggest to the will of the mirror once again to comment on the latest and most recent political events, with a description of its fauna (sharks aka politicians). One might be tempted to think that we are going to deal with issues such as economic measures and the consequent unequal sacrifice asked Italians, the real concern of the Government for laws such as wiretapping, and much more that we would be commenting. Too much to say I was tempted to start over from there, but I just said to start, or resume a path already beaten.
Therefore, it is not so, the image that the mirror showed me have anything purpose and direction.
Recently, I realized my desire: to swim in the sea, including coral reefs. After several years of procrastination, I managed to not only go along the banks, but its inside and deep in the Red Sea, then in Egypt and the precision in Marsa Alam.
Wonderful. As I expected, I will not say more than I expected, but without any kind of disappointment and this is a lot. Written
this, there may be some between the reader with a profile, character, say, a bit snobbish, and could, therefore, to say, "bah! The usual trip: Red Sea, crowds of tourists in Sharm ... etc.. etc... "
And therein lies the error. I will not bore you with a full account of the journey, but the intention is to groped to succeed, even a little, to make you feel what I've reported this to stay. Being able to make you understand that it was not the usual holiday of sun, sea other than the home, or in a place outside time, in the sense of having visited and lived in a time when it is raining and chilly in our house while there everything was about a sweet summer.

not want to tell you the trip, but, in other words, I want to write about the trip. I mean "journey" within the meaning of adolescence, which I always attributed to it: grab and store a series of impressions and emotions. Travel
as the meaning and profound significance that remains in us once we've come, what which has become one of our party, the food that has soul.
It 's true, such a trip in those places, can be seen and experienced as the most tourists, there may be, in the sense of the term consumerism: the village, feeling of being in a secure environment separate from the places visited, feeling short greenhouse plants and animals in the nature reserve.
But the difference is we do, we who can make this type of visit, the trip meant as I described a few lines ago, and that allows us, therefore, to live those places and its people, drawing from the overall sense in addition to individual emotions.
So why the title "Dances with Sharks"? I only got to borrow a famous title of a famous movie: "Dances with Wolves." I remember that after seeing the film, in addition to various emotions, the first and biggest was that I kept feeling that the "lost paradise", the man who has seen the limit, the frontier of the world as we know, and beyond of which there is a world created by something that is not us, the more perfect, or has arisen due to a balance that we could never achieve. In any event, a world we have lost, leaving it to be swallowed by the world that, instead, we have created with our hands, a less perfect and the end does not even reflect our true essence, so that often suffer for "nostalgia" that we feel for the lost paradise.
The same feeling I have tried living for a few days in the Red Sea, but I mean the Red Sea Marsa Alam: I heard the advancing border and the nostalgia for paradise lost.
There is a profound difference between the Red Sea in Sharm or Hurghada and Marsa Alam to, but there is still a difference between that of Marsa Alam and that of Berenice in Egypt or even further south.
It 'something that is perceived to skin. I swam with the turtles on the beach in Abu Dabbab, and I swam with turtles in some of the beaches further south and there was a difference. Abu Dabbab, you saw, and committed to living at the same time, committed to unmark tourists. The beach itself, looked like a museum besieged by groups of tourists with fins and snorkel. Further south I saw the turtles feed among the coral and watch, without moving, while you do you were watching, and then start to eat again, and then gaze at you, making you feel this, but contingent, bound at the moment, and rightly so, however, "foreign ". Felt, then, the need to let it be, greet them and thank them for the show that they had offered, for having pointed out, for those few moments physically, but spiritually, is still present today that I'm back, as a stranger in my house . They pushed me to pray because "something" that lies beyond us is able to save that show.

course, not just turtles. I also swam a few meters away from a barracuda along more than one meter, having seen him when I was already very close, while he stood there, under the boat a few meters from the shore, camouflaged with the same color blue water, I had seen for some time. I found there, stayed there, he the king of that realm, I invader temporary.
Moray size unspeakable, sea eagles which seemed to really fly in the water at speeds beyond belief, fish of a thousand shapes and colors.
Then even they ... sharks, including one who has traveled to several meters, in parallel with me, the barrier reef. Explorer I, at that time became explored the subject.
There I heard the border, I saw the wolf, "two socks" in which Kevin Costner danced; him the wolf, I, in my small way, the shark.
In those days I made friends with some local boys: local dive guides who have worked in several villages in various locations in the Red Sea and from vendors in the bazaars, but in reality students of Luxor, to earn something for a while selling souvenirs in the bazaars of the village.
Thanks to them, I knew something most of those places, but most of all, I had confirmation of my feeling: the frontier moved further south, the settlers put forward, less and less respectful of that world in which they are temporary visitors and always foreigners. They told me that that was the biggest barrier to the north, now a little squalcita, or tourists (especially Russians) who come to take the turtles to raise them triumphantly out of water.
Greeting, there I asked to do everything possible to save and preserve the place. I do that, perhaps exaggerating, I say "I danced with the sharks, I saw a world born of a perfect balance, warning that just enough to alter it. I therefore hope that the man keep it, but in truth I very much fear that this is not. At least I can do the same balance that created it, the Red Sea itself, which certainly gave me for what I say thank you: Shukran Marsa Alam.

When Can I Migrate Gba Pokemon Into Soul Silver

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Milena Velba Instruccion

About the construction of natural theories

When building a new theory, the real philosopher does not seek to name other philosophers, the true scientist never seeks other scientists to name, but they are automatically directed to them to try to understand more about issues that afflict them.

is the very body of new knowledge generated to guide the investigator for their developments. References and bases for the formation of a new knowledge born of free writing on it and reach it needs as intrinsic to the articulation and understanding.

When one aspires to discuss an issue in philosophy or science, it seems to me that the right thing to do is first understand more about certain points that, in our personal feeling and life experience, touching the question we want to lie on. So we educate. A technological marvel allows us even in our homes, sitting at our computers, we write well chosen keywords on search engines that drive us of the excellent encyclopedias or sites present in this bottomless pit of information that is the internet. And so we being directed by their own information, to seek other related to it and central to our argument. Such a direction is given by the fact that as we read critically the information we receive are automatically directed to seek a new topic that we have been misunderstood. And so it is to navigate the Internet, and the real interest in issues is then able to know more about them and their stories, there applying his epistemological sensitivity and personal experience to guide you through the navigation directions "right" the search for knowledge. And then you'll be learning how to sail, the machine becomes a tool to better understand the human, comes in with the extremes of either knowledge, we see the gaps which still remain unanswered about them and decides to lie, to argue , solve, or simply to develop greater capacity rhetoric possible.

Navigating on the information. The navigation is without doubt the best metaphor for the pursuit of knowledge through technological means. The scientist or philosopher, to build new information, browse through the hypertext of the Internet and will be driving slowly in search of a solid and well grounded knowledge on the subject it studies. The direction of its navigation is epistemological, a forehand, unknown or only glimpsed in a broader spectrum. It is the very conceptual navigation on the webs of knowledge already built, coupled with the intellectual sensitivity the author who will tell you what to question, where to go, how best support what is thought or argued.

I am convinced that the philosophical theories come before personal questions of the philosopher, the natural feelings of unrest that have sprung up to you as an individual questioner. Claims against certain natural concepts that the individual is fit and has not yet been able to incorporate accurately in his brain and conceptual network. At one point this guy feels so ripe for questioning in depth a specific topic and honestly seek to achieve a fuller understanding of your questions. The work of philosopher and the scientist is a work born of personal concerns under which wants to investigate deeply and honestly. And around these personal concerns of individuals, you end up seeing is built over the centuries a tradition of humanity's concerns, a well of cultural baggage, which features a deep epistemological cultural thinking - logical thinking of a people. When merging is then the feeling of uneasiness with the modern concerns taken in the past, it produces clear pictures of epochs and civilizations, demonstrating new intersections and notes that roam between different cultural and alarming concerns arising from a particular tradition culture, both in art as in science. Sometimes there is also the element consisting syncretic, that blend traditions in search of creating an element of the intersection that creates and that is greater than the sum of the parts that constituted it. Such events are quite syncretic found in Brazil, where different conceptual and anthropological summaries are produced by the blend of knowledge, information and beliefs of diverse cultures that formed the basis of our people.

The philosopher can have your sim glimpse while reading the other philosopher, but this time, Eureka is just the result of the text in question be able to play some kind of restlessness that was dormant in the soul of the reader-interrogator, and the true philosophers are - without doubt - the flame lighters philosophical other individuals. In this sense, the epistemologist Imre Lakatos argues that richer research program is a scientific or philosophical as he leaves more fruit for the world and for humanity. In his theory, the fertility of knowledge is that attests to its importance, that is, the more people study a subject, it will probably be more relevant in a particular historical moment. If today we discuss Kant or Socrates this is because these philosophers had questions relevant to other human philosophy and lit the flame of questioning, which has not abated.

The philosopher is an artist to create his work mixes his palette data and information using known techniques of logic and reason. Like any artist, he must be endowed with sensitivity excels so you know exactly what they can join with what, how to make the best of intellectual certain technique, how to mix data and facts in a logical perspective to generate new knowledge and relevant delicious to be enjoyed. The philosophy and science can also be understood as forms of intellectual aesthetic.

Bad philosopher or scientist is one who sits in his chair and forcibly try to invent some philosophical theory that artificially come to light only in order to oppose any other existing theory, in order to contest la. The true philosophy is that part of a truly intimate sense of incomprehension about the logic of operation of the physical world and society, everything else is sophistry. also true and the good reviews are those that depart from epistemologically sensitive concerns, not fully rational clashes on minute details of theories. Criticize me with his heart and his faith in the search for truth, not his stupid logic and reason, but rather use them as instruments of his desire to collapse the castle epistemological construction craftsmen.

Major theories and good scientific or philosophical 'bodies, and walk with their feet. The scientist or philosopher need not be anxious to seek new information or mechanically precise information to add in his theory to better shape it as the natural development of these will normally be able to guide the practitioner the most important points within a given theme concise . I truly believe that philosophical inquiry should develop naturally from the author's written on the subject and their concerns about him, these concerns will call forth intertextually all the cultural baggage of humanity. Of course, a critic can understand the intersection between a proposed new theory and vision of a particular philosopher / scientist who was not originally addressed by the author. And from this criticism, the author, directed the new source of information unknown to it, may try to incorporate it into their theoretical developments. Right now it runs the risk that the whole house of concepts and relationships generated will shatter or disappear, since the knowledge may not be compatible with each other in a logically coherent conceptual network. Moreover, new knowledge can enrich suggested, seating and cementing even more precise the arguments already proposed. In fact, the tradition of a philosophical or cultural overlap is precisely the new compatible ideas on each other to create a cosmology (or understanding of the world) a concise logical exemplary intellectual and aesthetic beauty.